Κυριακή 8 Ιανουαρίου 2012

A NEW - BETTER WORLD IS BORN

A NEW - BETTER WORLD IS BORN*

Dimtitris Lampos

First of all, I would like to thank the Roza Luxemburg foundation and the Journal Social History Online, as well as Mr Peter Birke and Mr Karl Heinz Rot for their invitation to this timely and important discussion.

Today, it is the 6th of December 2011. On this day, 3 years ago in Athens, a police officer murdered the 16-year-old student Alexandros Grigoropoulos. A murder that caused an unexpectedly dramatic uprising that not only shook the Greek system of governance, but, by causing a chain reaction of supporting movements from Europe to Australia and Canada, one could conclude that this event was a turning point for the global social movements that are seeking today their identity and the elements they have in common.  

So, let’s examine the events of that period, and first of all, the cold-blooded murder of an underage student. The location was EKSARXEIA, a district in Athens that has been the centre of political osmosis for consecutive decades and the place of birth of social movements, which have affected Athens and Greece in general. Moreover (and as an after-effect within capitalism), EKSARXEIA has been a place where state and para-state violence is heavily present, where agents and provocateurs are a common phenomenon, where the “contamination” of the district with drugs, abandonment and allegedly a high crime rate continuously turns out to be a methodical attempt to spoil the image of social movements and of the left people, who often have EKSARXEIA as their launching point of action.       

So in this district, in the historical district of EKSARXEIA, with the “bad” reputation but also with the continuous political action, despite and beyond its notoriety that others have fabricated and continue to fabricate, a small group of students argued with 2 police officers (the specifics that led to the argument are still unknown to this day). The police officers left and then the one of them decided to return to the original scene of the argument and murdered the 16-year-old student in cold blood. 

It is natural for anyone to wonder how intense this argument was, especially when knowing the attitude and power of the police force in Greece. A basic experience on the subject would easily suggest that there couldn’t have been be any intense argument at all. And in any case, what could truly -not of course justify- but at least explain this hideous murder?
Only the arrogance and the fascism of power that does not accept critique or any kind of free speech could explain it. Only the longtime shaping of the representatives of power on the streets -that is the police force- not for people’s safety but for their oppression and submission could ever explain this outrageous act.
The child died on the street and in less than 2 hours, Athens became a furnace. It was burning, not by the fires started by the provocateurs, vigorously shown by the mass media, but by the voices of outrage of a people’s gathering, so massive, so spontaneous and self-organized that we hadn’t seen in decades.
And it may be that the beginning of this was the murder of the student, but the reasons were clearly much more political and deeply social and to a certain extent class-struggle generated.
Young and older people from the lower and middle class came down the streets, as well as from almost all classes of Greek society, and this was a massive uprising that in many aspects started to shape its own political, class identity, which of course was still rough and blurry.
The provocateurs (para-state) emerged on the streets almost simultaneously with the riots, showing-off the reflexes of power that proves the constant fear and belief that sooner or later the subdued people cannot but rise up. And, allow me to stress here that this knowledge -and not just belief- should one day become a realization of society itself.
The outcome was the well-known chaos that the mass media showed to the world with a somewhat religious determination.
Nevertheless, in many cases the truth came out shining thanks to numerous videos shot by protestors and citizens that showed clearly the state–organized deceit:


Gradually, and in the following years even more, a growing part of society came to realize the terrible truth: that the ruling class which uses as a mask the state and the government, also uses the provocateurs and the extreme right wing to spoil and blemish the spontaneous social struggles. And the example of Greece is extremely important to the rest of the European countries, especially the ones that now start to formulate their own social movements that express their goals by protests in the streets.

The effect of December 2008 uprising was tremendous. Demonstrations and protests started in too many countries, some of which, such as Australia, had never shown such a fighting spirit and political activism before.
It was obvious that the spark that started in the ghettos of Paris in 2006 and became a fire in Athens in 2008 wouldn’t stop there. The globalised capitalism that nowadays tries to evolve into a global hegemonism, gave birth also to a global movement of reaction that sooner or later will evolve on its own into a movement of resistance and overthrow of capitalism.

In Greece, the social movement that started to form in 2008, might have been silenced for a while but soon enough the attack of the capitalist mafias –that some prefer to call abstractly “the market”- against the Greek economy and society led to a new start of the reaction, this time with a much more dynamically political character.
What is more, the movement of the squares, the Greek “indignados”, put forward, even if not clearly yet, the question of Direct Democracy. And it might be true that the provocateurs (this time under the skin of extreme right wing or other capitalist-friendly hybrids) came to the protests trying to transform the character of the movement and managed to an extend to keep things unclear regarding what direct democracy truly means, but in any case this was a giant leap for our political consciousness and realization.
In 2008, when some of us talked about Direct Democracy, many, some of whom progressive and political human beings, rushed to characterize us utopians. Three years later, Direct Democracy was the centre of discussion. Of course, the issue of a clear view on the subject remains, but it is just a matter of time, effort, discussion and mostly of knowledge. The realization that the representative democracy is a fake democracy, established just in order to cover up the true political rule of a small oligarchy of capitalists and that it must be replaced by Direct Democracy, the only true form of democracy, is a giant historical step.
Undoubtedly, this will lead to other important realizations. There are many people out there who know today that democracy does not exist if it is not direct and that Direct Democracy cannot exist inside the limits of an exploitative, ruling system, hence that direct democracy, cannot but lead to a classless society.

The apologizers of capitalism are trying of course to disorientate us all from this direction. This is what they get paid for, or at least what they hope to get paid for someday by the ruling class whom they fear and obey. And it is also true that still a large part of our society is not ready to accept the perspective of such important changes. The social institutionalization has always been a tool of the ruling systems and it is true that capitalism has turned it into a whole new science.
But as long as the attack of globalised capitalism against the people all over the world continues, the need for solutions and understanding by the people will grow and so the realization of what changes need to be done in the economical and social structure will grow deeper. And this entails the dynamic of an irreversible situation. It might turn out that today or in the near future humanity might not be able to leave behind the barbarism of capitalism. The humanity might even become more enslaved and go through the nightmare of the new, electronic Middle Ages that the rulers have been planning for decades. But whatever happens, humanity will not go back to the illusions of our near past. This is a wall that has fallen forever.

It is most certain that the evolvement of the social movements will not stop here. Perhaps what we have seen so far is only a spark of the upcoming events. Perhaps we haven’t even seen the real start yet, but how many times in history hasn’t the flood really started long after the first weak wave?

For now, silence follows the reaction. The one million protesters went back home, not only because of the murders by the provocateurs but mostly because of the uncertain political identity of the new movement. And if it is useful to search for the reasons of these long intervals of silence, we must honestly search into the sicknesses of what we call leftism. It doesnt have to do anymore just with the fragmentation of the leftist movement, or with the integration of the leftist movements into the ruling system. The problem is deeper and at the same time rather simple. If we do not overcome the social fragmentation created by the social division of labour, as well as the so-called ideological fragmentation of the social movement, then it will be impossible to overcome the submission to leaders, gurus and in any case rulers and exploiters of society. The new, better world cannot but contain us all. And this is a key point, I believe, closely related to Direct Democracy and classless society. We don’t need leaders or any kind of ruling authorities. We don’t need prophets or messiahs. We need to conquer the knowledge gained and accumulated by humanity to date, we need logic and courage: logic to deal with the crisis and courage in shaping the dream of a better world.
The most important and ironic thing nowadays is that for the first time, this better world is absolutely possible. Not as a compulsive consumerist paradise revealing to be hell, but as a society of real abundance for all the needs of all people. Without the paid slavery and exploitation, without the need of property, without the fear of tomorrow. And all this is not said by crazy dreamers, but it is proven by studies of the institutions of the ruling class. A small research in the statistics of the United Nations can persuade anyone that poverty, wretched living conditions, wars that take place -and may increase- for resources, all this atrocity, is not only a crime against humanity as it has always been, but today it is completely unjustified and absurd. The earth can provide everything to an even greater population than today’s population. The only reason why the capitalistic barbarism continues and still grows is that the oligarchy keeping the world wealth knows that with a few hours of creative work per day, the society may produce all the necessary goods for its members and in a descent way. But this would mean spare time and spare time means creativity and knowledge and these mean freedom. The war is not financial in the strict sense but rather political. What the power fights for is not the accumulation of wealth, as this has already taken place, but overaccumulation of ruling power. In other words, they want to finish up with society. Its goal is not just the low and middle classes but the concept of society itself. The absolute fascism dreamt by the hard core of modern, globalised capitalism would most probably impress even the most lunatic hegemonies in history. 
But the natural laws of the universe are still in force. Whenever there is action there is also reaction. Whenever there is suppression, there is also resistance, and against the absolute fascism there is today a global anti-capitalist movement of the people who dream of a free, classless world of Direct Democracy. If five years ago someone said that there would be strikes and uprisings in London, Brussels or New York, everyone would ridicule him. Today, this has already taken place. The social movements in Africa and Asia, and of course the full of promises Latin America, combined with the movements forming their identity in Europe and USA, and most of all the connection of all these in a global movement of resistance and overthrow of capitalism, is a fact. The success of this world movement greatly depends on one basic factor: whether it will manage to develop, remain independent and belong to the people or if it will be manipulated by the right or even left wing of the ruling system.
No matter what happens in the near future, the point is that the collective memory of humanity remembers today what was always known and what the rulers have tried to conceal: that the road to liberation, prosperity, happiness and freedom, the road which will place the humanity out of its barbaric prehistory and will lead it to its real history is the road to Direct Democracy and Classless Society.
Thank you.
__________________________________________
* Speech delivered at the meeting organized by the Journal Social History Online and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation on 6/12/2011, in Hamburg, Germany.


Δευτέρα 5 Ιουλίου 2010

AMERIKANISMUS UND GLOBALIESIERUNG. Die Ökonomie der Furcht und des Verfalls



AMERIKANISMUS UND GLOBALIESIERUNG

Die Ökonomie der Furcht und des Verfalls

 
(Esay über die sozialen Funktionen und die ökonomischen Nebenwirkungen der Furcht, als auch über die Rolle der Linke unter den Bedingungen der Globalisierung)

(Kurze Zusammenfassung)

Von Dr Kostas D. Lambos



Die natürliche Furcht hat sich während des letzten Jahrhunderts, von individueller, biologischer und gelegentlicher lebensrettender Alarm zu einem globalen machtgierigen lebenstötenden Albtraum umgewandelt.
Wir fürchten uns nicht mehr der Gefahr entgegenzutreten oder unser Leben zu retten, sondern wir werden ununterbrochen und systematisch bedroht und eingeschüchtert.
Wir werden beängstigt, um uns zu unterwerfen. Wir werden beängstigt, um uns beherrschen zu lassen. Wir werden beängstigt, um uns ausbeuten zu lassen, damit die reiche zu unserem Lasten reicher werden. Und schließlich wir werden beängstigt, um ständig und überhaupt Furcht vor jedem Machthaber zu haben. Wir leben schon lange her im Zeitalter der Furcht, wir leben in eine Furchtzivilisation.
Vor wen und warum haben wir aber Angst? Ich meine, dies kann nur die bisherige Geschichte der Menschheit beantworten. Gleichzeitig glaube ich aber, dass es nicht das Schicksal bzw. die Zukunft der Menschheit ist oder sein darf.
Deswegen versuchen wir mit diesem Buch die Zusammenhänge zwischen Furcht und Macht, Reichtum, Armut und Verfall zu untersuchen. Wir untersuchen alle Fürchte. Sowohl die kleinen als auch die großen und die ganz großen, d.h. die Weltfürchte bis auf die Furcht der neoliberallen Globalisierung. Und wir untersuchen sie von allen Seiten. Von innen und von außen. Allgemein und speziell.
Warum befassen wir uns mit der Furchtuntersuchung? Einfach um die Furcht zu überwinden. Um uns vor irgendwelcher Macht nicht mehr zu fürchten. Vor nichts und vor niemandem, auch vor der Furcht selbst. Um zu lernen ohne Furcht, frei und glücklich zu leben und zusammenleben.
Lesen Sie dieses Buch, wenn Sie Furcht haben, sei es auch Angst oder Phobie, vor Leben, Tod, Gott, Krieg, ‘Grossen Bruder’, Pax Americana, ‘Fremden’, Arbeitsgeber, Spiegel, eigenem Schatten und zuletzt, aber nicht als letztlich vor Armut, Zukunft, Freiheit, Ungerechtigkeit und vor allem vor den kleinen und/oder vor den großen, legalen oder illegalen Mafia, die unser Leben hemmungslos und systematisch ruinieren...und falls Sie etwas besseres vorzuschlagen haben, dann behalten Sie es nicht nur für sich allein. Diskutieren Sie darüber, protestieren, beanspruchen, widerstehen und fangen Sie sofort an, an eine bessere und gerechtere Welt zu träumen und für sie zu kämpfen.
Sie können sogar, ab sofort, als der Mensch von Morgen und nicht der von Gestern versuchen in diese Neue Welt, soviel wie möglich, wirklich zu leben. Aber ab Heute und nicht ab Morgen, denn der Morgen wird Übermorgen Gestern sein. Deshalb beeilen Sie sich, frei und glücklich, ohne Furcht und mit viel zukunftskreativem Pathos zu leben und mitzuleben.

Kurz über den Inhalt und die Architektur dieses Buches:
Furcht und Ökonomie: Hier werden die Zusammenhängen zwischen Furcht und Macht, die sozioökonomischen Funktionen, sowie auch ihre Folgen, wie Hunger, Durst, Krieg und Umweltkatastrophe der unter Globalisierung sich befindeten Menschheit untersucht.
Furcht und Verteilung des Weltreichtums: Hier wird die Furcht des Amerikanismus, als Furcht vor der Globalisierung bzw. vor der Pax Americana und ihre Rolle bei der Verteilung des Weltreichtums, sowie die Furcht des Antiamerikanismus, bzw. des weltweiten Widerstandes gegen Amerikanismus untersucht.
Einige Nebenwirkungen der Furcht zur Umverteilung des Einkommens in Griechenland: Hier werden die wichtigsten Gesichter des griechischen ‘mafia economic systems’ und seine Nebenwirkungen zu einer weiteren Umverteilung des Familieneinkommens der Armen zugunsten tagtäglichen Mafiosen, die die Furcht erwecken, organisieren und verwalten, untersucht.
Die Furcht des Gesetzes: Dieses Kapitel befasst sich mit der Natur der bürgerlichen Gesetzgebung, der in ihr verkörperten Furcht und strukturellen Gewalt, sowie mit den Konsequenzen dieser ‘ungerechten Gerechtigkeit, bzw. gerechten Ungerechtigkeit’.
Die Furcht der Freiheit: Hier wird versucht die historisch bedingte Furcht der Menschen vor dem Neuen, vor der Zukunft, vor der Freiheit zu beleuchten.
Kampf für einen Neuen Ökumenischen Humanismus: Die Antwort zur Furcht: Hier wird versucht einen Ausweg von der zentral und gewaltig strukturierten Furchtzivilisation des Kapitalismus, bzw. von der „Zivilisation des Todes“, zu der glocal (global+lokal) strukturierten Ökumenischen Humanistischen Kultur, eine Kultur ohne Furcht, die «Kultur der vergesellschaftlichten Menschheit» zu beschreiben.
Ein furchtfreies Werk, mutig, realistisch und überzeugend dokumentiert.
___________________________

Herausgeber: PAPAZISIS PUBLICATIONS, ATHENS 2009, GREECE










AMERICANISM AND GLOBALIZATION. The economics of fear and decay

AMERICANISM AND GLOBALIZATION

The economics of fear and decay

(Short summary)

(Essay on the social functions and the economical side effects of fear, as well as on the role of the Left Party under conditions of Globalization)



By Dr Kostas D Lambos





During the last century, the natural fear -which used to be an individual, biological and occasionally live saving alarm- has been converted to a global live-killing nightmare with a greed for power.

We are not any longer afraid to face the danger or save our lives, but we are continuously and systematically threatened and intimidated.
We become frightened in order to submit ourselves. We become frightened to control ourselves. We become frightened to let ourselves be exploited, in order for the rich to become richer to our detriment. Finally we become frightened to constantly fear every master. We already live for a long time in the age of fear, we live in a fear civilization.
But why and who are we afraid of ? I think this question can be answered only by the hitherto existing history of mankind. At the same time, however, I believe that this situation is not and it should not be the destiny or the future of mankind.

Therefore, we try with this book to analyze the relationships between fear and power, wealth, poverty and decline. We examine all kinds of fear. The small, the large as well as the very large ones, i.e. from the world-fears up to the new-liberal fear for globalization. And we will examine it from all sides. Internal and external. Generally and particularly.
Why are we concerned with the investigation of fear? We do it simply in order to overcome the fear. So that we do not any longer fear any supremacy. Anything and anybody, even the fear itself. In order to learn to live freely and happily together, without fear.
Read this book if you have a fear, even if it is a fright or phobia, of life, death, God, war, “big brother”, Pax Americana, “strangers”, employer, “Spiegel”, one’s own shadow and last but not least of poverty, future, liberty, injustice and particularly the small and/or the big, legal or illegal Mafia, which ruin our lives unrestrained and systematically and if you have to suggest something better, then don’t keep it only for yourself. Discuss it, protest, claim, resist and begin immediately to dream of a better and fairer world and fight for it.
You can even try immediately, as humans of tomorrow and not yesterday’s, to live in this new world as much consciously as possible. But do it from today on and don’t wait for tomorrow, because tomorrow will be yesterday the day after tomorrow. Therefore hurry up to live without fear, free and happy and with a lot of creative pathos for the future.

Brief summary of the content and the structure of this book:
Fear and economics: Here are investigated the relationships between fear and power, the socio-economic functions, as well as its consequences, like hunger, thirst, war and environmental disaster of mankind which remains under globalization conditions.
Fear and distribution of the world wealth: The Americanism, as fear of the globalization and/or of the Pax Americana and their role in the distribution of the world wealth, as well as the fear of anti-Americanism, and/or the world-wide resistance against Americanism is examined here.
Some side effects of the fear for the redistribution of the income in Greece: The most important faces of the Greek “mafia economic system” and its side effects to a further redistribution of the poor-family income in favour of day-to-day Mafiosi, which arouse, organize and administrate fear, are examined here.
The fear of the law: This chapter is concerned with the nature of the civil legislation, its embodied fear and structural force, as well as with the consequences of these “unfair justice” and/or “fair injustice”.
The fear of liberty: A try is given here to highlight the historically caused fear that the humans have of something that is new, of the future and of freedom.
Fight for a new universal Humanism: The answer to the fear: An attempt is made here to describe a way out of that central and enormous structured civilization of fear and/or of the “Civilization of Death”, to the glocal (global+local)-structured universal Humanistic culture, a culture without fear, the "culture of the socialized mankind".

A book free of fear, courageously, realistically and convincingly documented.



Publisher: PAPAZISIS PUBLICATIONS, Athens 2009, Greece







FEAR AND ECONOMY

The role of Fear
in the global distribution of Wealth
And some side-effects
in the re-distribution of Income in Greece

(Summary)

Dr Kostas Lampos





For a long time now, Fear has been transformed, from a coincidental personal feeling, to a permanent social behavior. The causes of this mutation are the deliberate use of Fear for power, imperialism and domination as well as the relevant with these reasons generalization of permanent hazards and menaces of the system.






All of us, rulers and ruled, lead our lives in the Century, Society, Economy and therefore in the Civilization of Fear.






This essay examines, first of all, the social functions of Fear and its role in the distribution of global Wealth, under the conditions of neoliberal globalization, which is expressed as Americanism, thus provoking Anti-Americanism.






In the second and most detailed part, this essay examines the economic side-effects of different kinds of Fear in Modern Greece, such as the Fear of God, of Death, of strangers, of Big or of Small Brother, of the Law, etc. as integral parts of a Mafia Economic System.






The essay concludes with a brief quest of an ‘Answer to Fear’. The writer states his belief that for the liberation from Fear, Humanity must generate successive ‘storms’ of a modern Enlightenment, gradually creating and fulfilling the vision of a New Ecumenical Humanistic Civilization, where the Humanism of the ‘socialized Humanity’ will consider as greatest principle ‘Man and Nature’ and not ‘Gods and Profits’.
____________________

Published by MONTHLY REVIEW, 49/01.2009, Pages 56-73, (Greek Edition)





HUMANISM or CAPITALIST BARBARISM

FROM EUROPEAN HUMANISM



TO CAPITALIST BARBARISM

or

TO ECUMENICAL HUMANISM?

 

By Kostas Lampos, PhD



There is an undisputed reality. It is the fact that the idea and ideals of Humanism have been born in Europe, developing and sealing –to a greater or lesser extent- the civilization of all European countries, and hence of global developments. There is, however, another reality: a reality that is being shaped today by the imperialistic Capital, which promotes an inhuman neoliberal globalization, spearheaded by Americanism. Finally, there is a third reality: This one has brought humanity at a crucial crossroads, where it is called upon to choose between two things: capitalist barbarism in the form of American hegemony on the one hand and Ecumenical Humanism, in the form of direct democratic self-determination and equal peaceful cooperation of all people in this planet on the other hand. As far as this is concerned, we shall approach the history of European Humanism and the position of contemporary Europe vis-à-vis this dilemma, which humanity is facing.



A short historical background to the concept of Humanism



There is a misunderstanding, or even confusion, regarding Humanism and New Humanism, which some find repulsive and others find provocative. For those who study -unfortunately the very few- the idea of Humanism -like all ideas, ideologies, philosophies and scientific theories- evolves, as it monitors the evolution of human civilization. Depending on the era and the strengths [of the idea] that are determined by its depth, this idea is either rejected in the historical process, or it survives, because of its ability to change, evolve and improve in quality, by adapting to new realities, exerting its own –big or small- influence.



Although the term Humanism (Humanismus) was coined in 1808 by the German philosopher Fr. I. Niethammer (1766-1848)(1) , and was confined to issues of training substance and education in general, it has been historically confirmed that the pillars of Humanism lie in the ancient Greek education and literature (2).



Protagoras’ worldview «Man is the measure of all things»(3) the humanist values on which the ancient Athenian democracy was built, like the ones described in Pericles’ Epitaph, as well as the teachings of Plato, Aristotle and other classical ancient teachers, have all been forgotten, becoming political “prisoners” to the obscurantist myths of Christianity, of the crusades and of the Holly inquisition. Therefore humanity has been deprived for centuries of the benefits that could have been brought about by a further development of the ancient Greek humanistic civilization. This situation stopped during the post-Byzantine period, when humanity decided to put an end to the medieval barbarism, hence the works of Greek classical literature resurfaced –at least those which survived the destructive madness of the Christian priesthood. During that era, the progressive disintegration of the Feudal system left a margin for Europe’s bourgeois transformation and the Renaissance movement was gradually replacing the -cunning and useless- “saints” with humanitarian educated men. The Renaissance was almost perfectly identified with Humanism and this led the intellectuals of early 19th century Humanism to suggest as synonyms the term «Hellenismus» (Hellenism) –German historian Johann Gustav Droysen, (1808–1884) and «Kultur der Renaissance» (Renaissance Culture) –by the Swiss Art & Civilization historian Carl Burckhardt (1818-1897)(4). The idea of Humanism remained dominant in central European countries for the whole of the 19th century in every discussion on education. Hence, through this discussion, it influenced the other sciences and society as a whole. This was enough to force the domineering religions, as well as the secular power structures, to add a touch of “Humanism”, in the form of “morality” and “philanthropy”, to their obscurantist myths and their hypocritical political ideologies of the ruling class. As a result of this, the discussion ceased to focus on Humanism as the substance of education and became a battleground for atheists versus priesthoods and religious fanatics, in a conflict that excluded -and still excludes- Humanism from the real society.



The French philosopher –one of the founders of the science of sociology- Auguste Comte (1798–1857) referred for the first time to “social humanism”, the main objective of which was to ensure the development -through a comprehensive human development- of the purely human element inside men, which is not conceivable without a complete departure from any religious myth.



The German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883), made a further step forward and defined Humanism, as a humanistic social project of ecumenical nature, which will gradually liberate humanity from the capitalist barbarism in the following words:



«The supersession of God, is the advent of theoretic humanism... the supersession of private property, is the advent of practical humanism… (both are) a necessary premise for positive Humanism»(5). With these two influential interventions to the evolution of the humanism idea, Humanism resurfaces as a social-ecumenical Humanism, it rediscovers its humanist essence and re-enters the social domain as a driving force, as a vision for the forces of Labour, Science and Culture, for a better world, a world of Equality, Freedom, Peace and Humanity.



2. The 20th Century Humanism and capitalist barbarism



All great wars in the history of humanity took place for one of the following reasons: “holy faith” in some god or prophet, for the benefit of “some motherland”, the “benefit” of humanity, or the cause of “eternal peace”. All great wars in human history derailed humanity from its course towards Humanism and Ecumenical Humanism and led it to today’s capitalist barbarism, which acts in the following manner:



a. It is hostile to nature and thus it destroys it,



b. It is hostile to Humanity and thus it limits its freedoms and condemns it to poverty, hunger and degradation,



c. It is hostile to human civilization and is thus scheming to impose global fascism,



d. It is hostile to life itself and thus destroys the means for its existence on planet earth.



To fulfill their goals, the forces of neoliberal capitalist barbarism must defame, discredit and overcome the idea of social Humanism and Ecumenical Humanism, especially after the revelation of the capitalist nature of the so-called “actually existing socialism”, which sparked again the interest on Humanism(6) . The reactionary forces seek to fulfill their goals by using any means at their disposal, underlined below:



a. Using the recruited -in its majority mentally castrated- bourgeois intelligentsia and its tendentious pseudo-scientific theories,



b. With the use of narcotic substances, the new “religion of football” and the racist nonsense with which they empty the pockets, brains and social-class conscience of the naïve,



c. With the ideological propagandas with which the “intellectuals”, the “artists”, the “party officials”, the controlled media and religious priesthoods brainwash, day and night, all the people -rich and poor- with strong doses of lies and fear, until they manage to persuade a majority that the world wars took place for the benefit of humanity. In the same spirit, the pre-emptive wars designed for a violent imposition of Americanism and of capitalist globalization took place “due to God’s will” or “for humanitarian purposes”.



The resulting confusion takes a large percentage of humanity away from the sphere of Reality, i.e. objective Reality, and into the sphere of controlled imaginary, i.e. artificial reality, forcing them as a result to give up their humanistic vision and acknowledge capitalist barbarism as the fate of humanity. It is obvious that the forces of the New Medieval Ages resist.



3. The “Humanism” of the “only truth” and of the Gulags (7)



In the end of the 18th century it became evident that the bourgeois revolution (1789), replaced the inhuman regime of feudal bourgeoisie with the power of the new bosses of capitalist plutocracy, who disproved their declarations of Freedom, Equality and Fraternity. The freedmen, who fought for the regime change, quickly understood that they were condemned to earn their miserable living as industrial workers and as “jobless reserve industrial army” in conditions of illiberality, offensive inequality and hostility that resembled the conditions of a Civil War. The workers decided to deal with this new reality with unions, class solidarity and class struggles, demanding to be recognized as human beings in accordance with the indefeasible rights of humanism. A new vision was being shaped amid those conditions. The vision of Socialism and Communism, to which leading cultural, artistic and scientific personalities from all over the world contributed their ideas, was adopted by certain traditional political parties as well as by many new, anti-capitalist, revolutionary socialist and communist movements. Among the theoreticians who contributed to the socialist vision, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels are the most distinguished ones. Through their analyses on capitalist economy and the bourgeois system, they provided the progressive leftist labour movement with arguments on the need to abolish capitalism and found Socialism. It is evident nowadays that their work received many interpretations and caused intense conflicts among their successors, some of which took the form of destructive civil wars, within the context of personal, class and ethnic interests. The October revolution took place in the name of Socialism, as a preliminary phase of Communism and with Humanism and Classless Society being the ultimate end. The main slogan was, “All power to the Soviets” (Labour Councils). Lenin, and hence the Bolshevik party as a whole, understood this power held by the Labour Councils, mainly in his work “The State and the Revolution” and seized power, with the help of the Red Army, in the form of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat”. He clashed, not only with the Russian workers, soldiers and sailors who supported the Soviets, but also with many of his former comrades, “Bolsheviks” and “Mensheviks” alike, as well as with most European socialist and communist parties, which spoke of a certain “Democracy of the Proletariat”, or a certain “Council Democracy”, advocating Socialism for the whole society, i.e. self-management of the Economy and Direct Democracy.



History, as historical juncture and international balance of power, “vindicated” Lenin and thus the October Revolution transformed the semi-feudal Czarist Russia into a “socialist country”, in which salaried work was not abolished –i.e. capital as a social relationship- and the productive wealth was not communized but instead became “state property”. Thus, the leadership of the October revolution intentionally identified socialism with nationalization and merely substituted the “free market” capitalism by capitalist entrepreneurs with “planned economy”, which had the “Soviet state” as its sole manager-entrepreneur, in other words a collective capitalist. In this way, from the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat”, the October Revolution gave way to the “Dictatorship of the Soviet Union Communist Party”, which was crudely mythologized, as socialism was violently detached from society while at the same time the “party” was exalted to the skies, and Stalin became a godly figure. All this ended up in the “Dictatorship of the only truth”, the brutal dictatorship of state monopoly capitalism, not simply Stalin’s dictatorship.



In reality, all the powers were being gradually transferred -upon Lenin’s orders, and utilizing the Red Army’s violence under Trotsky’s guidance- from the Soviets to the hands of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party and hence the management of factories -which in the beginning was controlled by the workers- was now transferred to party commissars. From that moment onwards, the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat” became a dictatorship of the “collective capitalist” and the Soviet society and proletariat were reduced to simple spectators and victims of the brutal state monopoly capitalism, which claimed to be “socialism”, was recorded as “actually existing socialism” and ended up as “former actually existing socialism”. Finally, today it is behaving like manic capitalism; now, whatever is left of it seeks to find historical alibi either in the “Stalinism phenomenon” or the “betrayal of Trotskyism”.



The defeat of Nazism and of the fascist axis in the Second World War, which came as a result of self-sacrifice on the part of all the European people –the Soviets included- was sealed with the bargaining of the so-called “Yalta agreement”, which in essence was an agreement of global capital at the expense of Labour and the victorious peoples. In this way, the imperialist annexing of the Eastern European countries inside the Soviet Union’s sphere of influence shaped the so call “Eastern bloc”, COMECON and the Warsaw Pact. The “actually existing socialism” was thus formed. Acting like capitalism, set as its target to “keep pace with, and even outpace, the (western) capitalism” in terms of production, wealth, military power etc.



As a consequence of this choice, society was further destabilized and Labour was being exploited in a more intense manner. Also, any civil liberties were suppressed even more and the peoples’ standard of living tumbled down so much that the socialist nature of the “actually existing socialism” –which the new ruling class, the nomenclature, together with all its dependent western communist parties, even called ‘Humanism’- came to be largely disputed. The peoples of Soviet Union started to push for socialism, more real socialism, and the actually existing socialism’s nomenclature responded with a return to the “free market” capitalism, i.e. with more capitalism. Just as the story of the October Revolution ended, the myth of the actually existing socialism’s ‘humanism” also ended.



The violent neoliberal capitalist globalization, which promotes global fascism and a globalized capitalist barbarism on a daily basis, forces the peoples of the whole planet to organize and resist this threat, seeking an anti-capitalist path which will lead them to a better world. Amid these conditions, the vision of Humanism, of Classless society and of Direct Council Democracy springs back to the people’s historical memory.



It becomes obvious that the vision of a New Humanism cannot bear any resemblance to the pseudo-humanism of the obscurantist priesthoods, the urban “philanthropic” hypocrisies, the Americanism of the ‘Guantanamos’ and the Stalinism of the Gulags. In order for the vision of new Humanism to be truly humanistic, it must be ecumenical in its conception and implementation. A contemporary revolutionary Left may act as catalyst towards this; a Humanist Left that will not settle -like the bourgeois social democratic and the traditional, 3rd and 4th International Left does- with being on the sidelines of the bourgeois Parliament. Instead, it will reach out to society, not to manage the capitalist power on behalf of the plutocracy, but to denounce the capitalist barbarism and to rally the forces of Labour, Science and Civilization, turning them into a force for Enlightenment, in order to overthrow capitalism and build an Ecumenical Humanist Civilization.



4. Initiative Dialogue for a New Ecumenical Humanism of the 21st Century.



The thinking citizens of the 21st century, all free thinking people, searching throughout History and visualizing its’ illuminating path, from the origins of civilization up to the present dark days, know that defending Humanism is a pre-condition for the salvation of Humanity. And being down-to-earth people, they are aware of the fact that the world will not change from the top, by messiahs and prophets; rather, it will change from the bottom, whenever the peoples themselves decide.



In this document we are merely expressing our views on the necessity, feasibility and nature of the change that humanity needs today. We call upon each fellow human who shares the same thoughts to do the same. Our purpose is obvious: The need for a Dialogue for a New Humanism to be understood by as many people as possible. In turn, these people will form similar Circles for Dialogue and Thinking, in the hope that this phenomenon will start spreading until a global combined force is created, that will be able to creatively overthrow capitalism, and that force will also act as an architect for a better world.



Therefore, 21st century Humanists know that the hard core of the local and global plutocracy eagerly seeks –and often fabricates- “new parties”, as soon as the old ones reach their expiration date and cannot be further consumed. Hence, Humanists do not seek a “New Party”; they are trying to form a New Humanist Vision which will rescue humanity from the impasse of capitalism, leading it to the New Freedom of Mankind.



They also know that in recent years many movements spring up, bearing the brand name “Humanism, New-Humanism” etc. Most of these “movements” mainly focus on the bipolar conflict between “atheism” and “religious – fanatics”. They are confined to this superstructure without dealing with the substance, i.e. the structure, which is the socio-economic system.



Very few movements by atheist “neo-humanists” touch upon the political-systemic issue, albeit with a pretentious anti-communist and anti-socialist manner and a pretentious moralist love for “holy property”, i.e. capitalism. Their purpose is the following:



a. to further improve capitalism, with the help of an abundance of state-funded, highly-sponsored “humanist non-governmental organizations” which give shelter to a variety of people, from wannabe saviors to secret service agents or representatives of shady financial interests.



b. To present some of the mega capitalists as “philanthropists”, through tax reductions for the profits of their corporations, so as to conceal their true repulsive face and their hideous role in the function of capitalist barbarism, e.g. George Soros, Bill Gates (!!) and many others. Finally,



c. To trick people into believing in the ‘alleged’ good intentions of capitalism, the same intentions that have condemned the vast majority of the planet’s population to misery, poverty and death by famine or by the “humanism of weapons”, as they now call the imperialist war’s latest form: the pre-emptive regional wars towards a violent neoliberal globalization of capitalism.



Contemporary Humanists, in contrast to the above, do not denounce any part of the global progressive movement’s history, not even the history of the -hypocritical- humanism of the bourgeois and the church. They are aware of humanity’s tribulations during its difficult historical course. Hence, they are not interested in deleting or re-writing any of the human history. What they are interested in, is for obscurantist priesthoods and exploitative power hubs to cease to exist, so that the liberated forces of Labour, Science and Civilization are able to write the future chapters in the history of Mankind.



This is why they want to look into the future of humanity without any ideological prejudice. They want to look into today’s reality, based on modern capabilities, needs and visions. This modern reality does not fit into yesterday’s visions, not even those of the greatest thinkers of yesterday. Humanity bows before them and acknowledges their great contribution to the Arts, Sciences and Literature, without which there would have been no potential for New Visions.



Our era possesses an abundance of intellectual wealth that cannot be measured, a huge amount of scientifically proven and socially useful knowledge, a fantastic technology and a succulent civilization. All these are products of countless sacrifices by the human race, from distant cavemen to the great researchers of molecular biology and astrophysics, to the astronauts who walked on the moon. These elements can today create GLOBAL PROSPERITY, DIRECT ECUMENICAL DEMOCRACY and ECUMENICAL PEACE. An Ecumenical Humanist Civilization can be achieved once the majority understands this capability and organizes its life in a different -rational- manner, based on the principle, “rational social economy for man and not chaotic catastrophic economism for profits”.



It is pretty obvious that behind most of these moves of hypocritical bourgeois and church humanism, lie certain suspicious interests which aim to disorient the people and take the place of the New, inevitable, Ecumenical Humanism(8) which puts forward the following proposals:



a. Total rejection of capitalism in every possible form, through procedures of radical Enlightenment expressed by the forces of Labour, Science and Civilization,



b. The overthrowing of the bankrupt means of production through a direct, democratic, fertile and creative ideological procedure, that will put an end to the domination of capital on the means of production, destroying the planet, brutalizing humanity and threatening life itself. Finally,



c. Gradual building of a better -meaning more humane- world, free from the economic selfishness which usurps social wealth and brings about social, regional, ethnic and wider inequalities, inevitably leading to catastrophic conflicts, which seek to find alibis in the “ideological-political fanatism”, the “religious fundamentalism” and the supposed “clash of civilizations”.



We are certain that, in this pursuit, we are not the only ones who keep a clear mind and think without selfishness, working to shape a new optimistic, realistic and effective humanist vision, a New Leap for Humanity, to set it free from the capitalist neoliberal, social democratic barbarism and towards a New Ecumenical Humanist Civilization.



Ultimately, the 21st Century Humanism can only mean the yearning, the effort and ability, as humanity, to dry those tears from Mather-Nature’s eyes and turn our life again into a work of art, which will become a source of creative happiness and an eternal jewel in this endless and glorious Universe.



With these initial and necessary clarifications, we continue the Dialogue on the 21st Ecumenical Humanism, in the hope that it will be enriched with the views of many other people and will spread around the world, becoming everybody’s issue, including the forces of Labour, Science and Civilization, once they are liberated from the obscurantist beliefs and authoritative ideologies. This is the only necessary condition for the New Freedom of Mankind, and the Ecumenical Humanist Civilization.



5. Europe at a crucial crossroads, between Americanism and Ecumenical Humanism



In view of this lethal power struggle for hegemony at the expense of humanity, there is one force which can act as a catalyst for developments: the European Union. In order for the EU to be able to undertake this task, it should:



• Stop acting as the Europe of monopolies,



• Get rid of liberalism and break free from the USA, since, as the American Paul G. Roberts states: “America does not offer anything to Europe, apart from the millions of dollars it pays to bribe European political leaders who betray their peoples»(9) . Forge a New European Identity and re-connect its traditions of humanist struggles with the values and vision of Humanism toward a better world,



• Unite with the movements against Americanism around the world,



• Play a leading part in the struggle to set up anti-imperialist and anti-hegemonic alliances at all levels so as to



• Be able to contribute to this anti-imperialist and anti-hegemonic struggle that aims in safely leading humanity out of capitalism or any other system that produces ill-thinking anti-social ideas and inhuman fascist and global hegemonic systems.



For all this to happen, the EU must stop acting as the Europe of Capital. Instead, it must become the Europe of the Peoples, which means that the European peoples will proceed to make immediate choices to gradually reverse this US-controlled balance of power, which is now taken for granted. This will pave the way for Direct Democracy, a Humanist Self-determination for Europe and for Ecumenical Humanism, the Humanism of the 21st century(10) . Now is the time for the European peoples to take the initiative once more, to lead humanity once again out of capitalist barbarism and in this struggle, the American people themselves, based on their history and sacrifices of the past, cannot but become the most prominent and important social force against Americanism and for a better world, to the New Freedom of Mankind.
______________


1. Niethammer, Fr. I. , Der Streit des Philanthropismus und Humanismus in de Theorie des Erziehunsunterichts unserer Zeit, F.Frommann, Jena 1808.

2. An analysis can be found in Markandonis and Georgoulis, Humanism, in the Encyclopedia of Psychology and Education – Dictionary, Ellinika Grammata, Athens 1989, vol. 1, p.p. 365-371.
3. Μέτρον πάντων χρημάτων άνθρωπος’.
4. Op.cit.
5. Karl Marx, Early Writings, RENGUIN BOOKS, 1992, p. 395.
6. See also, Erich Fromm, Socialist Humanism, Boukoumanis, 1976. See also, Novack, George, Humanism and Socialism, Andonis Livanis Publications, Athens 1978, vol. 22, p.p.365-37
7. The Russian word "ГУЛАГ"( Gulag) is the acronym for Главное Управление исправительно-трудовых ЛАГерей ОГПУ [The Chief Administration of Corrective Labor Camps and Colonies], which later came to denote the labour camps used to eliminate the Stalinism enemies. See also, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's (1973) The Gulag Archipelago.
8. Kostas Lampos, For an Ecumenical Humanist Civilization, EXORMISI, 05.01.1997. See also, Kostas
Lampos, The Humanism of the 21st Century is our Humanism, in: www.infonewhumanism.blogspot.com , and www.monthlyreview.gr
9. Cited in, Stylianou M, «The USA offer Europe merely a bribe for its leaders», in the TO PARON newspaper, 24.08.2008, p. 22.
10. Kostas Lampos, Americanism and Globalization -The Economy of fear and decay, PAPAZISIS PUBLICATIONS, Athens 2009.
___________________________
Published by MONTHLY REVIEW, 54/06.2009, Pages 44-55